Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Downloads
  • Artworks

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Not dead: Number Five is Alive
  • Ipso facto I passed
  • Argh philosophy
  • Up-grade
  • Beyond thought: liked, but…
  • Programming something…
  • Route 66: Oklahoma to Texas
  • I can has new internets!
  • Coolest of Windows 7
  • This is me: constantly

Categories

  • Farmland chronicles
  • h00min resources
  • ITainment
  • Japanese Music
  • Japanese TV
  • Johnny's Jimusho
  • Korean music (kpop)
  • Korean TV
  • Music
  • Psychology
  • Solstice Productions
  • Tomohisa Yamashita
  • Webdesign

Recent Comments

  • Feles on Route 66: Kansas & Oklahoma
  • Manu chan on Route 66: Kansas & Oklahoma
  • Manu chan on It made my day (even further)
  • SnowMyth on Life passes you by
  • Tsubasa on Downloads

Argh philosophy

Feb
03
2012

I’m currently studying Philosophy as part of my curriculum of Psychology, exam is tomorrow. I don’t feel too confident about this one. You also have to write an essay, which is what I feel somewhat more confident about; but the multiple choice exam I don’t. I can’t get any higher than an average of 76% on the test exams. On the last day, I decided to meticulously comb through the questions to see where I’m failing to get it over 80. Conclusion?

There’s about 4 questions I will never _ever_ get right in both sets. They are things like: “What does Descartes think you can learn about math?”

The correct answer is “res extensa” (existing) instead of “res cogitans” (thinking). If you look that up in the book, there isn’t any reference to the word math near these things so I choose res cogitans. The only reference to math there is: “objects have width height bla bla”. Yes, that’s part of geometry and so it can be called math – but I will not get the question right because there is no ‘hook’ for me to get it in there. The word math is not there. That’s the requirement of the speed I’m learning at. The ‘hook’ has to be there on the same page. If it isn’t I’ll fall back on ‘common sense’ or the general framework, but this question can’t be answered with common sense alone or knowing that Descartes was a rationalist and knowing what that means. Everything in the previous sentence is useless to you trying to answer the question.

A different question of the same type is going to hang me on the exam.

Posted in Psychology | Tagged philosophy | Leave a reply

Up-grade

Feb
01
2012

The final answer model just came out for stats. Instead of a 6 I now have a 7. lol. They corrected 2 questions.

:genki:

It was a really mean exam, so I’m really glad I passed.

Posted in Psychology | Tagged exams, statistics | Leave a reply

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Comments

  • Feles on Route 66: Kansas & Oklahoma
  • Manu chan on Route 66: Kansas & Oklahoma
  • Manu chan on It made my day (even further)
  • SnowMyth on Life passes you by
  • Tsubasa on Downloads

RSS Recent tracks

  • Testament – Over the Wall
  • DJ Tatana – All the time
  • 30 Seconds to Mars – R-Evolve
  • Technotronic – Pump Up The Jam
  • Lacrimosa – Halt mich
  

© 2011/ 2012 - Code Silence